 |
|
John
Conklin is a principal figure in American stage design, both for opera
and theatre. He wrote and directed The Carving
of Mount Rushmore for the 1992 Humana Festival.
When Jon Jory called me to create a piece of about an hour on any
subject for one Humana Festival, it was at once a total surprise,
an intriguing challenge and a source of deep anxiety even terror.
After all I was a designer
what could or would I do with the
creation of a dramatic text, with the unknown territory of working
in a daily rehearsal situation with a group of (probably skeptical)
actors and interacting with other designers not now in a relationship
as co-designers but as a director? However, as I thought
more about it (having blithely accepted), it seemed a typically unusual
and creative proposition to have been set forth by Jon and Actors
Theatre a way perhaps of breaking out of the sometimes rigid
classification of the theatre a way of allowing both theatre
practitioners and audiences to re-look at the boundaries and contents
and functions of the stage and their places in it.
I took as a basic text (and title) The
Carving of Mount Rushmore a study by Rex Alan Smith
of the life of Gutzon Borglum and his obsessive struggle to actualize
his dream to carve those massive presidential faces into the
South Dakota hills. This vision has become an American icon but an
icon of what
? Patriotism? Hubris? Self-realization? Ecological
vandalism?
I worked closely, and with deep respect and affection for, a group
of five patient, supportive, flexible actors, a dramaturg and my fellow
designers. We collaged historical texts, interviews, memoirs; improvised
monologues and interwove these with the deceptively simple poems of
William Carlos Williams the giganticism and overwhelming physical
literalism of Borglums vision contrasted with the quiet, interior,
but equally emotionally committed poetry of Williams.
Is this an apt image of the conflicts of expression that the theatre
tries to reconcile? a scale, a drama, an excess, even a kind
of crudeness that co-exists with a quiet, almost ordinary, almost
hidden depth of feeling that lies quietly beside it? |
|